Week 4 – Discussion 1 BUS250: Corporate and Social Responsibility (CUC1931B) ASHFORD UNIVERSITY
Your initial discussion thread is due on Day 3 (Thursday) and you have until Day 7 (Monday) to respond to your classmates. Your grade will reflect both the quality of your initial post and the depth of your responses. Refer to the Discussion Forum Grading Rubric under the Settings icon above for guidance on how your discussion will be evaluated.
|Insider Trading [WLO: 1] [CLOs: 2, 4, 5, 6]|
Prior to beginning work on this discussion, read Chapter 3, Chapter 6, and Chapter 9 from your textbook, the article Fair to All People: The SEC and the Regulation of Insider Trading (Links to an external site.), and the Week 4 Weekly Lecture. In a minimum of 200 words, supported by textbook evidence and other research, describe a recent example of insider trading. Determine if the case qualifies as insider trading established by the Supreme Court in United States v. O’Hagan (1997), described in the article Fair to All People: The SEC and the Regulation of Insider Trading (Links to an external site.).
Review several of your peers’ posts, responding to at least three of them by Day 7. Respond substantively to at least three classmates throughout the week, suggesting aspects that your peers may have overlooked. You are encouraged to post your required replies earlier in the week to promote more meaningful and interactive discourse in this discussion forum. Continue to monitor the discussion forum until 11:59 p.m. on Day 7 and respond robustly to anyone who replies to your initial post.